Rest of world
We are a thematic ESG fund manager where ESG and sustainability are integrated into the investment process and firm culture. For us sustainability is a natural part of our investment process and risk management.
We have a comprehensive and ever evolving ESG policy, covering relevant ESG angles for our strategy such as:
Exclusion – fossil fuel producers (oil and gas)
Inclusion – we seek out companies that support the transition to a carbon free economy by focusing on three areas of Energy Transition: Renewables, Energy Efficiency and Electrification
UN SDG alignment with SDG 7 – support innovation for clean and affordable energy and SDG 13 – climate action
We use SCOPE analysis and ESG score as an integrated part of our bottom up analysis
We are UN PRI signatory
SFDR Article 8 compliant
The Sub-Fund's sustainable objective is to achieve positive environmental changes by fostering the transition occurring globally around the production, storage and distribution of energy from traditional sources of energy such as fossil fuels to more sustainable sources such as renewable energy. This is referred to as Energy Transition.
The Sub-Fund will gain exposure to companies which have activities that contribute to climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation.
Proxy P Management AB (the "Investment Manager”) will avoid investing in companies that cause significant harm to environmental or social objectives by applying an exclusion approach and will review the alignment of all investments to the sustainable objective using its proprietary ESG scorecards.
Article 8 per EU 2019/2088 (SFDR)
All sustainable investments which the Sub-Fund makes will be checked to ensure that it does not cause significant harm to any objective.
The Investment Manager will avoid in investing in companies that cause significant harm to environmental or social objectives by applying an exclusion approach which restricts investment in:
In addition, the Investment Manager will assess all sustainable investments using its proprietary “ESG Scorecards”. These ESG Scorecards include quantitative metrics, adverse impact indicators and flags that are used to assess a wide range of ESG criteria on the prospective investment.
This ongoing assessment ensures that the investment manager will reduce and restrict investments that may cause harm to sustainable investment objectives. The Investment manager may permit investments in companies that score poorly on some ESG criteria, if they deem the issues to be not severe enough to be classified as significant harm and/or they deem its positive contribution to the sustainable investment objective of the Sub-Fund to outweigh any harm.
To achieve positive environmental changes by fostering Energy Transition and therefore contributing to climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation. The Sub-Fund has a sustainable investment objective pursuant to Article 8 of the SFDR and aims to achieve this by investing in companies whose activities contribute to the environmental objectives that are set out in the EU Taxonomy.
The Sub-Fund aims to invest a significant share of the portfolio in companies with a majority of their business activities considered as favourable to Energy Transition and avoiding companies whose activities would significantly harm the sustainable investment objective. In order to identify companies which the Sub-Fund may invest into, the Investment Manager will apply a thematic selectivity approach, by applying both exclusion and inclusion criteria.
|Companies with revenues derived from activity||Controversial Weapons (Landmines, Cluster Munitions)||0%|
|Global Norms||UN Global Compact||Serious violations|
|Sovereign Issuers||Freedom House Index||Insufficient Scorings|
From this reduced investment universe, an inclusion process then seeks to identify companies engaged primarily in renewable energy production, energy technology or related industries that stands to benefit from the development and/or production of energy within the sector or companies directly or indirectly supporting decarbonization.
In the multiple stages of the investment process (Quantitative Analysis and Fundamental Growth Analysis stages), the Investment Manager makes use of proprietary ESG scorecards with the intention of limiting the exposure to ESG risks and to seek out investment opportunities. Developed utilising external research and data, and proprietary quality analysis by the Investment Manager, the ESG Scorecards provide assessments for the individual components of environmental, social and governance aspects of each company which it invests. The ESG Scorecards of all investments are monitored daily.
Investments resulting from the exclusion and inclusion process will form the majority of the portfolio and will classify as "#1 Sustainable" the pre-contractual disclosure for Article 9 products as per SFDR. It is expected that a majority of the portfolio is eligible for the purposes of the Taxonomy Regulation. It is however difficult to determine the portion that is aligned to the Taxonomy Regulation due to the evolving regulations and limited availability of data. Investments made as part of portfolio hedging, FX hedging and those made for cash management purposes will fall into the "#2 Not sustainable" category.
The Investment Manager performs an ongoing assessment of the Sub-Fund's investments, ensuring the investment remains eligible for the investment universe. At the same time, to ensure that the Sub-Fund continues to meet its sustainable investment objective and restricts investments that may cause significant harm to it, the Investment Manager continues to monitor the attributes within the ESG scorecards.
The Sub-Fund intends to utilise the alignment of the portfolio to the UN's Sustainable Development Goals 7 and 13 as its sustainability indicators. Specifically, the percentage of the portfolio which is aligned to both:
The Sub-Fund utilises multiple ESG research and data providers. This data is complimented by the Investment Manager’s proprietary research based assessment of the investment companies.
The main methodological limits are:
As described in other sections, the Investment Manager conducts an ongoing review of the Sub- Fund's investments, referencing the data contained within the ESG scorecards to ensure that the sustainable investment objective continues to be met.
The Investment Manager does not actively directly engage the companies which it invests. Instead, they seek to engage indirectly by voting on the corporate actions of any issuers in the portfolio in support of shareholder friendly governance decisions.
The Investment Manager will review all holdings on an ongoing basis to ensure compliance with and attainment of the sustainable investment objective.